Cathy Davidson argues that education as a whole is deformed when it is only geared to “will it help you get into college.”
A new column at Inside Higher Ed interviews executive-level women in academia.
Even though the job market is terrible, a job that doesn’t fit you is not actually a good idea, even if the way this correspondent framed that point was, rightly, criticized for being elitist. Here’s another take on the same subject, with a little more humility and a little more self-knowledge.
Is academia a bad boyfriend?
Half of women in science wanted to have more children but didn’t because of their careers, and a quarter of men in science agree.
A long-time administrator reflects on the things he wishes he’d known from the beginning. Dean Dan responds from his own experience.
Can you avoid burnout?
Sabbaticals aren’t all cushy freedom – they often bring a temporary paycut. Here’s some advice on planning for it.
Karen at The Professor Is In has advice for your first year on the tenure track.
Lee Skallerup Bessette at Bad Female Academic talks about the need for shameless self-promotion.
Struggling with academia? I offer one-on-one coaching by phone and by email to help people articulate and work through where they’re stuck.
A friend of mine recently got the opportunity to apply for a full-time marketing job at a company she loves. She’s been doing marketing for years, and six months ago, this was exactly what she wanted.
In the intervening period, though, she’s taken another job, one that will lead a different direction. And she’s loving the new work. She’s excited by it. She’s challenged by it.
But when the old-desired opportunity showed up, literally at her desk, she got conflicted.
The shoulds come knocking
It’s easy to get caught up in what jobs we think we should apply for, what careers we should pursue.
Sometimes it’s about previous experience or prior desires, as it was for my friend. Sometimes it’s about prestige – about certain careers being “good” and others not. Sometimes it’s about our families of origin and the kinds of jobs or careers they pursued.
Unless you’re actively unemployed and need a job to pay the rent and buy the groceries (and that is very, very real), I’d recommend passing on the shoulds. Because the shoulds are a one-way ticket to stuck and stasis.
Stuck and stasis are not helpful
When the shoulds are involved, it’s easy to tell ourselves that it’s just “for now.” Just until we find something better.
Maybe that’s staying in your graduate program. Maybe that’s adjuncting. Maybe that’s teaching at an institution you don’t fit in a place you hate. Maybe that’s teaching high school when you really don’t like teenagers. Maybe that’s taking an office job that bores you silly at your mom’s organization to get your foot in the door.
But here’s what happens after that. We’re kind of comfortable. We’ve gotten a few more lines on the resume. The work isn’t painful, but it’s not challenging or interesting either, or the working environment takes a constant toll on us. Maybe we’re even getting paid a decent salary.
And so, when it’s time to actually go find that other job, the one we actually truly want, we hesitate.
Change is doable
The reason people get trapped is that they’re afraid. Changing jobs and careers takes a lot of work, and it’s hard to have confidence that you can do it successfully.
But the way to gain confidence – and thus keep yourself moving towards your actual goal – is to understand that changing jobs and careers is a process. It’s not exactly a linear process, but it’s a defined process none-the-less.
And the way to get comfortable with that particular type of change is to get familiar with and comfortable with the process. The situation will always be different. But the process, the process is always the same. (Says the girl who’s changed careers three times!)
That’s part of why I’m teaching this new Becoming Post-Academic class – because I want you to learn about the process enough to be comfortable, and so be comfortable going after what you really want.
If you’re interested, you can learn more by clicking here. But however you do it, give yourself the gift of learning about the process, so you can step into it with confidence, with grace, and with success.
After Academe responds to William Pannapacker’s recent essay by suggesting that adjuncts, new PhDs who can’t find tenure-track work, and even graduate students should just walk away, because working for pennies makes us complicit in the problem. Karen of The Professor Is In weighs in as well.
Bad Female Academic continues the discussion of the ways class plays in to “fit” in academia, and Post/Academic discusses her own experience.
The conversation about class has been really wide-ranging; Lee Skallerup Bessette pulls it all together.
Melonie Fullick (aka Aesthetic Vigilante) does a rocking Month in Higher Ed.
Shame is normal as we struggle with writing in academia.
Karen at The Professor Is In describes how she built a CV.
Anastasia Salter recommends starting a tenure box to keep everything you might need to present.
Timothy Burke takes on the market, and then further considers his argument.
Struggling with academia? I offer one-on-one coaching by phone and by email to help people articulate and work through where they’re stuck.
Apparently, the AAUP’s guidelines on faculty with physical or mental disabilities hadn’t been updated since the late 1960s. They’re getting right on that.
You can deduct unreimbursed research expenses from your taxes – but only if you’re a professor.
Dr. Crazy describes an early part of her writing process, one that doesn’t look like writing but is integral to it.
Benefits like personal leave are only valuable if people actually believe they can use them when they really need them.
Graduate students are relying more and more on loans.
New book coming out: how to balance motherhood and academia.
Dr. Crazy talks about class in the academy and explicitly brings gender back into the conversation.
Tonight I’m holding a free teleclass on 3 barriers to overcome in the post-academic job search. Join us!
Mark Silver, who is both a long-time Sufi practitioner and an entrepreneur, makes the argument that instead of focusing on jobs or careers, it’s helpful to focus on what he calls your Jewel – that essence of what you bring to the world.
So long as you’re living from your Jewel, he says, there are any number of jobs or careers that you’ll find satisfying.
So what is this Jewel anyway?
In Silver’s definition, our Jewels are essential qualities. (For him, they’re essential qualities of the divine working through us, but we don’t need to go there in this conversation unless you want to.)
More importantly, our Jewel is something that emanates from us, that other people get from their interactions with us. It’s something central to who we are, rather than what we think or believe.
Here are a few qualities that might underlie your Jewel:
| Strength
Love
Safety
Radiance
Beauty |
Widsom
Insight
Joy
Peace |
So how is this helpful again?
We tend to focus on jobs and careers because they’re obvious – we have job titles, we work for companies or institutions, we have responses when someone asks us at a party what we do.
But those jobs and careers have likely come out of something else, a felt sense of something that was meaningful to you.
One question I often ask people is what drew them to academia in the first place, because in the answer lies something very important: what this person wanted, deep down, from this experience.
Another, related, question I often ask people is how they want to change the world. (Yeah, I’m fun at parties.) Of all the injustices and problems in the world, what are the ones you can’t let go of, the ones that rub against you? (This doesn’t mean they have to be Mother Teresa-level problems.)
The meaning at the center
What you wanted to get from academia and the ways you want to change the world are both central to the ways you are your own unique person, related to but different from your family and your fellow academic travelers.
Understanding both of those will tell you something about where you might want to look next.
If you were drawn to academia because you wanted to explore the edges of our knowledge and you want desperately to cure illness, your next step is likely to be different from the person who was drawn to academia because they wanted to immerse themselves in conversation that they found interesting and who wants the world to be more beautiful.
So ask yourself these two questions to help get at the chewy center of your own life and self.
Why was I drawn to academia in the first place? And how do I want to remake the world?
I had a boyfriend in graduate school who would periodically work himself into the ground. When we talked about it, he would say that he only had to work this hard until he got a tenure-track job, and then he could relax.
Even then, years before I left, a cynical voice in my head would say, yeah right. And then it’ll be until you get tenure. And then it’ll be until you make full. And then you’ll have no idea what to do with yourself.
He wasn’t working himself into the ground because it really was necessary in order for him to get a tenure track job, although I’m sure he believed this. He was working himself into the ground because he was profoundly anxious about the process.
Moving the goalposts
I pick on my ex only because it was such a blatant example of what I’m talking about. We all do this all the time.
I’ll be happy when X happens. I’ll take time off when Y happens. I can’t do Z until Q.
We conditionalize a lot of our behavior on things that may or may not be within our control. And that means we give over our happiness and our choices to a capricious world.
This is not an argument against working hard
There are times, sometimes sort and sometimes long, when there really is a meaningful relationship between behavior we don’t want to have long-term and a goal.
When you’ve got six weeks until the deadline to turn in the dissertation, maybe you are working 18 hours days. But as soon as that diss is turned in, you’re not going to keep working 18 hours days, because it was about a concrete goal.
But there’s a difference between a concrete goal and a moving target.
Success in sheep’s clothing
A tenure-track job may seem to be just like the dissertation deadline – something concrete you can point to. But there are two fundamental differences.
First, the dissertation deadline is (for the most part) within your control. You can work more or less, you can ask for more or less help, you can plan or not plan. It’s not easy, but meeting it, barring serious and unforeseen circumstances, is something you can actually accomplish.
The tenure-track job, on the other hand, is subject to dozens of difference institutional, generational, and locational forces that have nothing whatsoever to do with you. There are thousands of bright, capable, utterly qualified people out there who do not have tenure-track jobs because there weren’t enough to go around.
Second, the dissertation deadline is clear-cut and tied to an end in itself. You finish the diss, and you graduate with a PhD. You may want to deploy the PhD into other things, but it is, itself, an end point.
The tenure-track job, or tenure, or the promotion to full – these are all usually markers of academic success rather than being ends in themselves. And that’s why the post moves every time we achieve one of these markers.
What’s your definition of success?
I’m going to generalize for a second: Academics, as a group, are deeply uncomfortable with success. Every time we achieve something that might count as success, we decide it doesn’t really count until we achieve the next thing that might count as success, which doesn’t really count until we achieve the next thing that might count as success. Lather, rinse, repeat.
It’s damn hard to feel good about the work you’re doing when success gets infinitely deferred into something still farther away.
So let me ask you this: What is your definition of success? How will you know when you’ve succeeded? What will deserve a celebration?
How much is that within your control?
This is the heart of the struggle
We didn’t just make this up out of whole cloth, every one of us. This deferral of success is built in to the fabric of the academic world.
This is a large part of why we feel like failures when we don’t move neatly through the milestones of success. This is a large part of why we feel like grad school was a waste of time unless we achieve full professor somewhere (we think of as) prestigious. This is a large part of why we can’t give ourselves credit for all of the amazing things we’ve already done, whether or not we go forward.
Look carefully at what counts as success. Be wary of being Charlie Brown to the academic football. It ends messy.
We have this idea that academia is a meritocracy, and that therefore good ideas and good work will be rewarded. But as Rachel Connelly and Kristen Ghodsee point out, a little self-promotion can go a long ways towards earning you that career promotion.
Damon Horowitz started as a technologist, then got his PhD in Philosophy, and is now the in-house philosopher at Google. That’s pretty cool.
If you’re feeling burnt out, a little faculty development can help.
Aesthetic.Vigelante thinks about how the value of professional activities intersects with class and opportunity for graduate students – and thus shapes careers.
How do you create a professional network? One person at a time.
Jason B. Jones gives us a roundup of recent articles that will help you understand faculty governance.
Interdisciplinary work, while valuable and wanted, often gets caught in institutional border disputes when it comes to tenure. USC has issued explicit tenure and promotion guidelines to avoid this.
Editor Kathryn Allan advises PhDs, especially in the humanities, to look beyond “research and writing” as important skills they bring to the table.
When did you start to notice the ways men and women in the academy are treated differently? Karen at TheProfessorIsIn talks about getting schooled on her own sexism.
Geekosystem gives us an infographic about some of the realities of graduate school. The most chilling for me was the number of PhDs granted vs. jobs created between 2004 and 2009.
Part of the isolation of struggling with academia comes from not knowing other people’s stories.
For every other major transition, you have people around you who tell you their story, or their best friend’s sister’s story, or what have you. Breakups, moves, marriage, parenthood, college graduation. But leaving academia? Who tells you that story so you can feel more comfortable in your own?
There’s so much more out there now than there ever has been to support you, but sometimes you just want to hear the stories.
So I’ve created a separate part of the site for people to share their stories. It’s new, and I’d like to invite you to share your story, whatever it is right now, so we all know we have traveling companions in this journey.
You can do by clicking here or by using the Tell Your Story tab at the top of the site. I hope you’ll share, and I hope you’ll come back to read other people’s stories.
As much as I believe in the power of a calling, in the idea that for each of us there is work that makes us sing, sometimes the idea of a calling can paralyze us.
How do I know this is really my calling? Maybe it’s just a passing whim. Can it possibly be important enough or meaningful enough or whatever to be a calling? I have no idea what my calling is and so I must stay here in misery until I do.
We humans, we’re so good at using our big, powerful brains to confuse the hell out of ourselves.
Sometimes we have to jump.
You probably don’t know this, but my own process of leaving academia looked something like this.
- Spend two years in a tenure-track job confused and miserable.
- Realize I want out.
- Spend two years miserable and convinced I can’t do anything else.
- Have a series of Big Ideas that go nowhere after teensy-tiny setbacks. (Oh, copyediting, I think I’m glad you and I never got together.)
- Take a deep breath and send out a couple of applications.
- Six weeks later, start a new job in a new city.
Sometimes I talk about that last bullet to make the point that you never know what will happen when you start applying, no matter what the averages or the medians or other people’s experiences are. Serendipity happens. I got crazy lucky.
But today I want to talk about a different aspect of those six weeks.
Six weeks took four years
It’s easy to look at the six weeks between when I sent in my applications and when I started a new job and think, holy hell, that was really short!
And in terms of packing up a household of two adults, two dogs, and two cats, finding new lodgings, putting a house on the market, resigning one job (and career!) and starting another, yes. Yes it was. It was so short as to be just this side of insane. (I really don’t recommend it.)
But that six weeks was a product of years of thinking. And dithering. And doubting. And wandering. And wondering. And hoping.
I brought all of that with me when I took the plunge to send in applications, and I brought all of that with me when I actually accepted that job and walked into my chair’s office to resign.
But if I hadn’t, finally, jumped, those four years would simply have been misery. They were something else because I held my breath and did something terrifying.
It worked
I learned a lot in that first job out of academia. One of the things I learned was that I don’t actually like being a fundraiser, but it was a reasonable hypothesis to start with. I jumped out of academia, and I spent three years learning all kinds of things before needing to jump again.
Only this time it was easier. I already knew I could switch fields and not die. I already knew I brought a whole host of skills and talents to the workplace. I already knew I could make it outside of the ivory tower.
But I didn’t know any of that until I jumped. And I wouldn’t have learned any of it if I hadn’t jumped.
In which I quote Finding Nemo
There’s a scene near the end of the movie Finding Nemo wherein Dory the amnesiac and Martin the panicking parent are in the mouth of a whale. They’re hanging on to some part of its tongue, and it’s telling them to let go. Martin yells to Dory, “How do you know something bad isn’t going to happen?”
She says, simply, “I don’t.” He lets go, and the whale shoots them out of its blowhole into Sydney Harbor – exactly where they wanted to go.
Sometimes, we need to have faith that our lives will unfold in beautiful and interesting and compelling ways, and that we can’t actually control this. Sometimes we need to actually jump into the unfamiliar possibility in order to get the next layer of understanding that gets us closer to our calling.
Sometimes the best way to find our calling is to try things.
So go ahead. Jump.
Take a leap into the unknown and trust that whatever happens next, you will be enough to deal with it and learn from and it and be that much closer to knowing what you actually do want.
And maybe, just maybe, you’ll find out that this new thing you doubted, it really is what you should be doing.
(And I’m really sorry if I put the Pointer Sisters in your head….)
Not sure how to jump? I’m teaching a free class on August 1 that covers common misunderstandings about academics we have to deal with, strategies for translating your skills into non-academic settings, and a 6-part system for finding a job you love. You can learn more and sign up here.
Many of my clients get stuck right at the point where thoughts and dreams move into action — and for good reason. Leaving academia and entering a different career or job trajectory is more than a workplace change. It’s a cultural shift, and it brings along all of the baggage and translation problems and confusions that come with cultural shifts.
That’s why I’m really excited about two new courses I’m offering in the next few months and I wanted to let you know about them.
Overcoming the 3 Barriers to the Post-Academic Job Search
The first, Overcoming the 3 Barriers to the Post-Academic Job Search, is a free 90-minute teleclass designed to give you the practical tools you need to make the transition from academia to a post-academic job.
- 5 primary ways academics are misunderstood and how to demonstrate your difference
- Strategies for identifying and translating academic experience into non-academic skills and accomplishments
- 6 steps to running a successful job search outside of academia
You can read more about it, and sign up, by clicking here.
Becoming Post-Academic
The second, Becoming Post-Academic, is a six-week teleclass designed to help you craft a comprehensive and successful job search. It includes the following:
- Concrete action steps that get you to your goal
- A system that tells you which steps to do when – and that you can use whenever you decide to change jobs
- Evidence of your experience, skills, and accomplishments
- Strategies for researching companies and translating your talents into their needs
- Ways to succeed at interviewing
- Non-scary strategies for networking
- 9 steps to simplifying negotiations – and getting what you want
- The confidence to move forward and actually step into a new career
You can read more about it, and sign up, by clicking here.
|
Free Teleclass! Overcoming the 3 Barriers to the Post-Academic Job Search. Learn more by clicking here.
Sign up for the newsletter!
Myths and Mismatches eCourse Now Available! Jo VanEvery and I have put together a free eCourse on the most common myths and mismatches we see in people who are unhappy in academia.
It's one lens through which you can examine your own unhappiness and better diagnose the problem -- which makes finding a solution that much easier.
Find out more by clicking here!
|