Monday roundup

First rule of any office: Respect and be nice to the staff.

A tale of three job search seasons: One person’s anonymous experience.

Monday roundup

Stephen C. Stearns gives some advice to graduate students. He adds to it here.

Tenure is not faring well in the University of Louisiana system, which laid off tenured professors only to hire some of them back as adjuncts.

Should you write for free if you aren’t on the tenure track – and thus eligible to profit professionally from your contributions?

Isaac Sweeney’s recent academic cover letter in the Chronicle created a bit of a firestorm. The comments are … varied.

Dressing for success outside of academia.

Whose dream is it?

I’m reading random back issues of the New Yorker, and I happened to come across a profile of Gil Scott-Heron, who passed away last week. One of the things he said stuck in my mind.

“All the dreams you show up in are not your own.”

He’s commenting on the ways that we sometimes show up as bit players in other people’s dreams, but it got me thinking.

Even as we show up in other people’s dreams, it’s important that the dreams we’re living out are our own.

Other people’s dreams

Sometimes our dreams for ourselves get taken over by other people. I see this sometimes in the people I talk to who are struggling with academia.

Maybe academia started out as your own dream, but somewhere along the way it got taken over by someone else’s dream – your advisor, whose dream for you is an R1, when your dream for yourself was a regional teaching university; your institution, whose dream for you is the tenure-track when yours was just graduate school.

Living out someone else’s dream can lead to focusing on something you don’t much care about, delaying family decisions you desperately want because someone won’t approve, making choices based on someone else’s values instead of your own.

Whose dream are you living right now?

Live your own life

What is your dream for yourself? When you imagine your perfect life, what does it look like?

When you imagine that perfect life, do you experience yourself yearning for it? If not, figure out whose dream it is, then imagine your perfect life again. What does it look like now?

We’ll never be satisfied by living someone else’s dreams. That’s not to say we never compromise or work in partnership with others, especially our partners, because of course we do. But that’s about a larger dream we’re all in, not giving over ours for someone else’s.

All the dreams you show up in are not your own. But make sure the ones you’re aiming for are yours.

Not sure what your dreams are? Join me and Jo VanEvery in a six-week class designed to help you figure out what your possibilities are. Click here to find out more.

Diane Sawyer asks three questions

The other day at the library, I picked up a book called The Right Words at the Right Time. It’s small essay after small essay by famous people about the words that changed their lives. I found most of them unmoving (sometimes you have to be the person in question for the words to land right), but then I came across Diane Sawyer’s piece.

She’s describing a time when she was young and aimless, and her father asked her three questions: “What is it you love? Where is the most adventurous place you could do it? And are you certain it will serve other people?”

They’re a pretty good framework for thinking about your calling.

What is it you love?

We’ve talked about this one a lot, but it really is central. Doing what you love gives you energy, it doesn’t take it. Doing what you love gives you the impetus to work and grow and learn, because it isn’t a chore.

The biggest misconception I see with “do what you love” is the tendency to associate “what you love” with a job instead of with activities. We love talking to people. We love solving problems. We love organizing things. We love helping people who have been through shit come out the other side. We love teaching. We may love a job that incorporates all the right elements, but while the job may not be transferrable, the elements always are.

Where is the most adventurous place you could do it?

We have a tendency to think small. It’s easier to think about careers in the usual way.

But what if you could join the activities and skills that light you up with a context that blows you away? What feels adventurous to you?

For some people, adventure is about travel. They’ll teach English in a foreign country, sign on to an NGO, or hightail it to Thailand because you can live there for cheap while telecommuting to a company that pays a standard US salary.

But for some people, adventure is going to be rethinking their family arrangement to have each adult work half-time so both people get to spend lots of time with the toddler. For some people, adventure is going to be picking up and moving to the place you always wanted to live, because now you can.

One of the advantages of the mostly-crappy experience of coming to a crossroads is that everything is up for grabs. If you’re going to move anyway, why not move exactly where you’d like to? If you’re going to change careers anyway, why not explore the thing you’ve always secretly wanted to?

Are you certain it will serve other people?

It’s easy to reduce “serve other people” to Doctors Without Borders or the Peace Corps or teaching. But it’s so much more than that.

The person who writes young adult novels that help teens get a grip on their lives? Serving other people.

The person who designs beautiful furniture that doesn’t cost a first-born? Serving other people.

The person who designs surreal puppet shows that expand people’s minds? Serving other people.

The real question is, how is this serving other people? It’s about articulating to yourself how this betters the world, because connection work you love with the world gives it just a little more gravity.

Three questions

So how would you answer these three questions?

Is leaving irrevocable?

Is leaving really irrevocable?

This is one of the biggest fears – and biggest stumbling blocks – I hear from people who are considering leaving. Once they make the decision to go, they say, there’s no going back.

And to a large extent, they’re right. Especially in a market like this one, where there are dozens, sometimes hundreds, of applicants for any given open position, hiring committees aren’t likely to look closely at someone who has left and returned when they’ve got application after application from bright young things just out of graduate school, bearing the latest theory and impressive credentials.

But that doesn’t mean the situation is quite as clear-cut as all that.

There are exceptions to every rule

This you-can’t-go-home-again bias is more true in the humanities than in the social sciences, business, or the hard sciences. Not only are the humanities the hardest hit in the undersupply of jobs and oversupply of PhDs, but the humanities encompass the fields that put the least value on practical, hands-on experience.

Many other fields have a long tradition of people moving from industry to higher ed and back. How likely it is in the case of any given academic depends on things as varied as specialty, grant funding, trends in the industry, and the phase of the moon.

The converse is not necessarily true

But often, when I’m talking with people who are afraid that if they walk away, a door closes forever, I’m wondering just how open that door actually is right now.

Given the trends in academia – towards contingent labor, towards less and less public funding, towards increased service obligations, towards fewer viable university presses and journals, towards an ever-more imbalance between the number of PhDs and the number of jobs available – I’m not sure that the door is open for any but a very few, very lucky people who happened to be in the right place at the right time with just exactly the right combination of scholarship and experience and personality.

In other words, the writing may be on the wall even if you aren’t deciding to walk away.

The realities of the job market are not about you

None of this is to say that you aren’t qualified or aren’t deserving or aren’t absolutely brilliant. You are. You are all of those things. You absolutely deserve a real job doing what you love.

Unfortunately, deserve has very little to do with what actually happens. And what is actually happening right now is that many – and I would say most — of the qualified, deserving, brilliant graduates aren’t getting those tenure-track jobs, because they don’t exist. And that’s not because anyone is out to get you, and it’s not because administrators don’t value tenure-track faculty. It’s because we happen to be around during a particular historical moment when the economic circumstances of higher ed are changing in ways that may never reverse.

So when people worry that walking away is irrevocable, what I always want to ask is how likely it is that staying will produce a different outcome. In every case I can think of, it’s not that the door was absolutely closed, but it wasn’t open very far. That’s because when people are honestly considering leaving, it’s because things, for one reason or another, haven’t worked out as planned or hoped.

Some people are going to want to take their chances on that crack, and that’s reasonable. But there will be a point at which that crack disappears and the door is effectively closed. Maybe it’s because you’re too many years out of school and you’re competing with people who are newly graduated. Maybe it’s because your field is being systematically trimmed from various institutions. Maybe it’s because tenure-lines in your field are rapidly disappearing and the only things that are really available are contingent positions.

When that door closes, the question of whether leaving is irrevocable isn’t really relevant anymore.

I hate being the voice of doom

But I hate watching people throw themselves against impossibilities even more. I hate watching bright, amazing people, people who have so much to offer, doubt their own self-worth because the numbers just weren’t in their favor. I hate watching people compromise their own futures by accepting section work that doesn’t pay the bills. I hate watching people get bitter and angry because things haven’t worked out.

This is a particularly horrible time in academia. Maybe it will shift for the better sometime. I really hope it does, because I believe in the importance of higher education and I believe particularly in the value of the humanities. I know too many amazing academics, people who are working hard with increasingly fewer resources, to write it all off.

But I also know too many amazing people who didn’t get the brass ring to believe that this situation is benign. It isn’t.

Walking away may be irrevocable. And if that door is still open a crack and you want to take your chances, power to you. I want every person who wants an academic job to get a good one, because we need that brilliance and dedication. We need it desperately.

But if that door is closed, I hope that you are able to mourn and walk away. Because the rest of the world needs your brilliance and dedication just as desperately.

If you’re walking away but don’t know what else you could do, join Jo VanEvery and me in a six-week class designed to help you figure out what your options are. We start June 12. Click here to find out more.

Monday roundup

A weekly collection of interesting things I find around the Internet. Find something I didn’t? I’d love to hear about it the comments!

What people were talking about this week

Does the increase in quantity of academic research compromise the quality?

Richard Vedder argues that faculty should shoulder work loads like those in other professional fields: medicine, law, accounting. What I want to know, though, is how “not in the office” equals “not working,” since teaching takes place elsewhere and most faculty do research and writing elsewhere.

Paypal founder offers students $100,000 for two years to develop business ideas instead of going to college.

Advice for new tenure-track faculty.

It used to be that newly minted PhDs were advised to publish chapters of their dissertation as articles before publishing the whole book. Advances in technology and politics may be changing that dynamic.

There’s a new resource for navigating graduate school: Gradhacker.org.

Nicole and Maggie talk about the crappiness of the “when to have a baby” choices for female academics.

Responsibilities vs Accomplishments

When you’re sitting down to write a resume, it’s hard enough to remember every job you’ve ever worked and everything you did in each one, the better to pick out the relevant information for whatever you’re applying for. But the hardest part – and the most important – is turning those responsibilities into accomplishments.

Responsibilities are not enough

It’s important to start with what you were responsible for. Those job duties are going to give a reader a sense of the scope of your position, and if you’re applying to a company big enough to run resumes through a key word search, those job duties will, properly described, light up with keywords.

But responsibilities alone aren’t going to convince someone to take you to the next stage of the application process, because nothing in a list of responsibilities will tell the reviewer if 1) you actually did what you were supposed to do, and 2) were any good at doing those things.

This is where accomplishments come in

Given all of your responsibilities, what did you get done? Did you streamline the technical process so website downtime dropped 10%? Did you win a $2m grant to research personality type at work? Did you grow the program from 5 minors to 100?

These are the kinds of things that tell a reviewer all about your strengths and skills – both your skills in the hard and your skills in the soft. If you successfully came up with, proposed, funded, and put on a brand new conference that has since become annual, then the reviewer knows you’re a visionary and you can make things happen. They know you can fundraise and make good arguments and coordinate lots of logistics.

And while you can tell them these things outright, it’s always helpful when a reviewer can see how all of your tasks added up to something important. That helps them envision what you might be able to do in this workplace. And that’s the kind of response that gets you an interview.

Working on applying to non-academic jobs? I have resume-writing superpowers that I’d love to use on your behalf.

What you want to do depends on what you think is out there

When I was in high school, two friends of mine cracked up one day reading the Help Wanted section of the local newspaper, because a company was advertising the position of sausage handler.

What did a sausage handler do? They had no idea. But the very opacity of the position led to years of jokes.

You probably don’t want to be a sausage handler

One of the things we miss, being in academia, is the wide variety of jobs it takes to accomplish even the simplest of corporate, non-profit, or government missions.

Because we live in a world dominated by disciplinarity, we don’t see the ways those disciplines get combined, sliced, blended, and superceded out there in the working world. We don’t see the sausage handlers, or the market researchers, or the non-IT project managers, or the organizational trainers, or the strategy captains, or the investigators, or the user design experts, or the inventors.

Because we live in a world of strict credentialing and clear pathing, we don’t see the various serendipitous ways that people get and become qualified for jobs. We don’t see the ways jobs are more about skills and fit than they are about degrees.

But outside of academia, jobs are being invented daily that don’t have paths or credentials, because the jobs themselves didn’t even exist yesterday. But something changed and now we need someone to do this particular set of things. Voila – job.

Finding out what’s out there can be fun

You probably won’t run across sausage handling jobs very often (at least I hope you don’t!), but one of the best ways to explore your options is to actually go out and scan job boards, company job postings, and anywhere else you see jobs listed.

What jobs are out there that you didn’t even know existed? What jobs look interesting even though you’ve never even considered it?

One of the biggest challenges people have when they’re considering leaving academia is expanding their sense of the possible. There are far more opportunities out there for you than you know about, but until you go looking, you won’t know what they are.

Starting June 12, Jo VanEvery and I are leading a class designed to help you find out more about your own career possibilities. You can find out more by clicking here.

Sometimes academia is like a soggy potato chip

Have you heard of the soggy potato chip theory? It goes something like this: A kid would always love a crisp, new potato chip, but if soggy potato chips are all there is, they can be satisfying too. It’s an analogy to attention, and the way kids would always prefer positive, supportive attention, but if negative, critical attention is all they can get, they’ll take it. Attention is that important.

Many of us in academia are like those kids.

We want the tenure-track job in our preferred geographic area for a decent wage and a reasonable teaching load. We want friendly colleagues and a supportive research environment. But if adjunct teaching or a non-tenure-track and thus year-to-year job with a high teaching load and crappy conditions is all we are offered, we’ll often take it.

We want so badly to be part of academia, to live that life that we imagined for ourselves that we’ll accept a watered-down version that actively drains us – because it’s less painful than walking away from what we really, actually want.

I say this not in condemnation. Not at all. I say this because walking away from what we want is incredibly, terribly painful.

That’s why it takes so long

It would be great if we could sit down, make a pro and con list, and rationally decide that yep, leaving is the way to go, then dust off our hands and dive in to the process of finding another job, maybe moving.

Maybe that’s how it works for some people. That’s not how it worked for me, and that’s not how it works for most of the people I talk to.

For most of us, it looks more like this. Spend weeks or months or even years miserable and ground down and exhausted. Consider leaving. Get excited about a few possibilities. Look at real estate somewhere we actually want to live. Have a lovely weekend imagining a different life. Go back to work on Monday energized and excited. Teach a great class. Have a nice conversation with a colleague. Start doubting that you really need to leave. Maybe you just need an attitude adjustment. Maybe you just need to buckle down. Spend a few weeks throwing yourself into your work. Find yourself crying or angry for no apparent reason. Start looking at job ads. Find a few that seem exciting. Sit down to try to draft an application. Freak out and decide you’re staying.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

Leaving is a process, not a point

You are going to doubt yourself. You are going to question every single one of the experiences that led you to consider leaving in the first place. (Maybe they weren’t that bad.) You are going to go back and forth between hope and despair. You are going to try to talk yourself into staying. You are going to try to talk yourself into leaving. There may be weeks when you get nothing done at all, in any direction.

This is completely normal.

Leaving academia is an enormous thing. It affects your identity, it affects your sense of the rightness of the world, it affects your belief in yourself.

None of that means that you’re a bad person, or that you should stay or that you should go. It means only that you’re grappling with something huge, something that will likely be a fork in the road.

It is not fun. But it is normal.

Ways to make it a little bit easier

If you can accept that this is as much a part of the process as everything else – i.e., you avoid beating yourself up for all of the back-and-forthing – it’ll be easier on you.

If you can give yourself the space and understanding and compassion to just watch all of the doubts and fears and hopes and dreams arise, you’ll learn something about what you really want and what matters to you and what’s standing in your way.

If you can be patient, you’ll arrive at a point that has some foundation to it. You’ll find a place to stand and a decision you’re committed to, however scary it is.

If part of what’s standing in your way is a fear that there’s nothing else you’re qualified to do, join Jo VanEvery and me for a six-week class designed to help you expand your sense of what careers are possible for you. It starts June 12, and you can find out more by clicking here.

Two weeks until our next class!

Two weeks from today, Jo VanEvery and I are starting another round of our Choosing Your Career Consciously course. If you’re wondering what, besides academia, you could do with your life, we’d love for you to join us.

We started the class because we kept encountering smart, talented, skilled people who were convinced that they weren’t worth anything outside of academia. They’d say they had no experience or training or ability to do anything else, and so they felt either doomed to stay or completely at sea out there in the non-academic world.

But they aren’t doomed to stay in academia, nor were they actually rudderless in the non-academic world. And neither are you.

Academia can make us believe that it’s the only job we’re fit for, that it’s the only place that will make us happy. Occasionally, that’s true. But only occasionally. Most of the time, in fact, there’s a whole set of interesting, fulfilling, compelling, righteous jobs and careers that you would rock.

Finding that set, though, that’s where people get stuck. And that’s what this class addresses. We help you figure out what you have to offer, what kinds of jobs and situations you’re actually interested in, and where those jobs might be hiding.

If you’re considering leaving academia but don’t know what else you could possibly do, join us for this six-week class. We would love to help you find out. Just click here to find out more and sign up.

Questions? Drop us a line at joandjulie@joandjulie.com and we’ll get them answered.