Escape the Ivory Tower

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Tell Your Story
  • About Julie

December 15, 2015

Give Yourself Room to Fall Apart

I’ve been talking, the last few weeks, about the four things I say most often to leaving academics.

  1. You have more skills than you think.
  2. The best way to find out what jobs actually exist in the world is to ask people what they do and what they like about it.
  3. Of course you’re exhausted and grieving, and that is as it should be.
  4. Step one is always abundant, luxurious self-care, as much as you can possibly stand.

Today I want to talk about grief, because this is one of those topics that gets shoved under the rug. Grief is messy. Grief is inconvenient. Grief isn’t practical.

Grief is absolutely essential.

Grief does work

We have a tendency to think about emotions as extraneous. They’re what get in the way of thinking, planning, getting on with things.

And that’s sometimes true. When we’ve bottled up our emotions, when we’ve avoided them, they get kind of piled up and they just shoot out at the least convenient, most awkward times.

When we’re able to show up to them as they happen, however, they do work. Anger helps us identify crossed boundaries and re-sets them. Fear helps us identify the need for increased safety. And sadness and grief help us let go.

I don’t pretend to know how this happens, only that it’s true to my experience. Grieving is part of how we let go and move on. It’s part of how we acknowledge the shift.

But make no mistake about it: Grief is work. It is exhausting. It saps your energy, it dulls your interest in other things, it can make you want to do nothing but sleep. Within reason, let it. (As always, if it starts significantly impairing your ability to go on, please see a doctor. Grief and depression aren’t the same thing, but they can overlap or be triggered by one another.)

A tale of two griefs

When I left academia, I didn’t give myself any room to grieve. I worked my last day in higher ed on a Friday, and I started my new job, a couple hundred miles away, on Monday. That Monday evening, I went out to meet friends at an event, and that was the pattern for a long time. I worked, I did household stuff, I saw friends. I acted like it wasn’t a big deal. On some level I didn’t think it should be a big deal.

Of course it was a big deal. How could it not be? I had spent the previous eleven years of my life — more than a third of my existence — either being a professor or having professorship as my goal.

So my grief was in there, but I tried to ignore it and it came out at all the wrong times. When a friend’s husband was considering applying for the job I left, I got angry and tried to talk him out of it. I woke up in the middle of the night, sobbing for no reason I could identify. I alternately read everything I could on academia and wanted nothing to do with it.

Eventually, years later, I was able to slow down and show up to my grief. At that point it was like a spelunking mission. I had to dig it out, find the pieces I’d shoved down into the darkness. I had to make space in a life that had moved on. I had to untangled the grief from later choices, from new opportunities, from my health. I don’t recommend it.

Some years later, my sweetie and I decided to let go of a long-cherished dream of being parents. I must have gained some skills in the intervening years, because when the grief welled up — and it welled up off and on for years — I just … let it. I didn’t try to justify it or argue with it. I didn’t beat myself up or reconsider the decision or even start telling myself how awful it all was. When I was aware of any thoughts at all, they amounted to some version of “yes, I really wanted that, and it’s not going to happen, and that’s worth grieving.”

But here’s the difference: When each spate of grieving passed, it passed. I might feel a little emotionally tender for the rest of the day, but I was able to snuggle the babies of friends, attend baby showers, and generally celebrate and support parenthood elsewhere. I am not, all these years later, finding bits and pieces of that grief transmuted to bitterness that comes out an inappropriate times.

Sometimes, often, that grief looked like sadness and tears. Every once in a while, it looked like anger and I would shake my fist at the heavens. It’s not that it always showed up in the same way, and heaven knows it wasn’t particularly convenient. But when I was present to it when it showed up, or when I made space for it when I couldn’t be present to it in the moment, it did its work and dissipated.

Please, grieve

If you’re leaving academia, you’re experiencing a great loss. It may be the best available choice. It may even be exciting and compelling. There’s still a great loss under there.

The more you can show up to the grief, the more you can let it move through you rather than trying not to have it, the easier a time you will ultimately have.

If your life is particularly full and you don’t have the room to experience the grief as it shows up, make a regular appointment with yourself and grieve. Wear your comfiest clothes, wrap yourself in a snuggly blanket, hide out in a room with all the lights off and blinds drawn, and grieve. Say to yourself, this is something I deeply wanted, it was important to me, and it is worth grieving. Let whatever comes up come up.

It doesn’t say anything about you that something you wanted didn’t work out. It happens to everyone. It doesn’t make you a failure. It makes you human.

Welcome to the ranks of humanity. We have all had things we wanted not turn out. We have all grieved. This is simply when and how it is showing up for you.

Be gentle with yourself, accept the grief, and know that it will fade.

Filed Under: Grief and Leaving 1 Comment

December 8, 2015

Tip: Ask People About Their Jobs

A few weeks ago, I talked about the four things I say most often to academics who are considering leaving.

  1. You have more skills than you think.
  2. The best way to find out what jobs actually exist in the world is to ask people what they do and what they like about it.
  3. Of course you’re exhausted and grieving, and that is as it should be.
  4. Step one is always abundant, luxurious self-care, as much as you can possibly stand.

Last week, I talked about the skills you’ve probably not thought about. Today I want to talk about figuring out what jobs are actually out there.

There are more than you think

There’s a reason “what are you going to major in?” and “what are you going to do with that?” are such classic questions. Our cultural narrative around careers still believes the Boomer-era model of degree > entry level job in field > up the ladder > retirement is what should happen.

The problem is that most jobs these days don’t fit into a linear progression, much less emerge from a single degree.

Here are some jobs I know about, via colleagues and friends and lots of conversations:

  • Helping a company figure out how to use SEO
  • Managing a marketing roll-out
  • Coordinating a project that has regular and irregular outputs
  • Designing the straps for backpacks
  • Supporting the brand on social media (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc.)
  • Creating and managing a two-year-long training program
  • Helping companies understand unconscious bias and how to combat it

There’s not a single one of them I could trace back to a single college degree.

Because higher education is cut into domains of knowledge, and because one of the functions of higher education is to prepare people for a certain segment of the working world, it makes sense that we implicitly assume that the one maps onto the other.

That’s only made worse because there are some fields that work that way. They tend to be the fields that require credentialing (think accounting, nursing, and law), and they tend to be the kinds of jobs we know about because they’re consumer-facing.

We don’t see all of the many jobs that don’t work that way, because they aren’t the jobs we come into contact with as consumers.

You don’t know what you don’t know

It can be really disheartening to think about leaving academia when it seems like there are no interesting jobs out there, because you don’t want to teach high school and you don’t know what else you could do.

So whether you’ve decided to leave or you’re still contemplating it, it’s helpful to start building an understanding of all of the various opportunities out there.

One way to do that is to browse job boards. This isn’t my favorite method, because it tends to get overwhelming and because it’s sometimes hard to see beneath the job title and description to figure out what the job actually does.

Another is to identify some companies you might be interested in and haunt their careers pages. This gives you insight into the company itself and the various roles people play.

My favorite method is to ask people about their work. Now, I’m an introvert, and small talk makes me want to pluck my eyeballs out with a dull spoon, but you’d be surprised how happy people are to talk about their work. The conversation goes beyond small talk really quickly when you bring curious questions to the table.

  • Oh, interesting. What do you like about it?
  • Huh, you know, I don’t know very much about X. What’s a typical day like?
  • So what is the company’s overall mission? How does your job fit into that?
  • Are most of the people you work with doing [same job] or are they doing different things? What are they doing?

The goal is to start internalizing the reality that most of the jobs out there aren’t ones you can name right now. As you start learning about jobs, you’ll also start recognizing your own reactions to them — Oh, that part sounds kind of interesting, but ick, that other part would make me want to cry. This is really important information. This gives you a starting point for identifying which kinds of jobs you want to learn more about and which you want to avoid.

The holiday season is perfect for this

Most of us will, within the next few weeks, end up at a party of some holiday description. Maybe it’s a spouse’s company’s holiday party. Maybe it’s a church potluck. Maybe it’s a PTA end-of-semester party. Maybe your mother-in-law throws an annual Boxing Day house party.

These are perfect situations for having a series of job conversations: You’re probably having to talk to some strangers, and you’re in a situation where it’s relatively easy to talk for 10 minutes and then excuse yourself.

But don’t assume you only need to talk to strangers. Your sister’s best friend, your brother-in-law, your son’s friend’s mother — each of these people probably has a lot to say about their own work and the work that happens around them.

Now, if you run into a Negative Nelly, just smile and thank them and change the subject. The last thing you need is a dissertation on why something sucks. Just know that most of the people you’ll talk to will have some good things to say about what they do.

At this stage, you aren’t asking anyone for a job. You aren’t asking anyone for introductions to someone else. You’re just gathering information you can use to figure out what else might be out there for you.

Filed Under: Practicalities Leave a Comment

December 1, 2015

You Have More Skills Than You Think

I posted recently about the four things I say over and over to leaving academics.

  1. You have more skills than you think.
  2. The best way to find out what jobs actually exist in the world is to ask people what they do and what they like about it.
  3. Of course you’re exhausted and grieving, and that is as it should be.
  4. Step one is always abundant, luxurious self-care, as much as you can possibly stand.

Today I want to focus on the first one, because no matter what you do in academia, you’re probably ignoring a good 90% of your skills.

There are good reasons academics can’t identify their skills

In most workplaces, you work with a variety of people who all do different things. Those different jobs throw skills into relief. You know that if you really want to figure out how to use Excel well, you go to Laura, but if you want data interpretation, Mark is your best bet. You can see those different skills around you all the time, and you have a sense of what people come to you for.

Well, in academia, pretty much everyone around you is doing exactly the same job. Everyone is teaching. Everyone is doing research. Everyone is mentoring students. Everyone is serving on committees. The differences tend to show up in the content — what you’re teaching, what you’re researching, who you’re mentoring, what committees you’re serving on. It’s then really easy to conflate content with skills. I don’t know how many times I’ve heard someone tell me that the only thing they know how to do is be a Dickens scholar / historian of 14th century Britain / expert on Schopenhauer, and no one outside of academia needs those things.

Even if you can decouple content and skills, everyone around you is practicing pretty much the same skills you are, which means they don’t seem all that noteworthy. It’s easy to assume “everyone can do this — they don’t need me” when, in fact, everyone around you IS doing this. But academia is a rarefied little bubble, and the skills that are a given in academia are not remotely a given elsewhere.

This was driven home to me when a group of colleagues and I were presenting the results of some work to the leadership team. We had everything in powerpoint, and we were taking turns presenting slides. I happened to go last. Everyone before me read the powerpoint slide out loud, while staring at their paper, then turned it over to the next person. Having spent 11 years teaching, I riffed off of the powerpoint slide, assuming the leadership could read just fine, putting the results into context, drawing conclusions, etc. All the things you do. But leaving that meeting, I was suddenly surrounded by colleagues asking me in a wondering tone of voice how I learned to do that.

Now friends, I was never more than a competent teacher. It was not all Dead Poet’s Society up in my classroom. But what was competent, good-enough teaching in academia was “holy shit, that was amazing!” when I was surrounded by people who did not have a decade’s worth of experience teaching.

So when I say that academics frequently ignore the vast majority of their skills, I understand why. It makes sense. But if you’re considering leaving, you’ve got to dig in deeper.

How to identify all those glorious skills of yours

In order to figure out what skills you aren’t aware you have, you need to write down each and every thing you do for a given domain.

Let’s take teaching as one example. Here are all the pieces that come to mind immediately:

  • Write a syllabus.
  • Write a lecture.
  • Present a lecture.
  • Facilitate discussion.
  • Design assignments.
  • Design assessments.
  • Work one-on-one with students.
  • Evaluate assignments and assessments.
  • Norm evaluations with other teachers.
  • Research new topics/ideas/things in your given subject.
  • Review textbook options.
  • Calculate partial and full grades.
  • Provide feedback.

Once you have this list, you dig into each bullet point.

What does it take to write a lecture? You have to break content down into lecture-sized chunks. You have to do research to fill out the chunk. You have to organize information within the lecture. You have to find examples and illustrations to help students grasp the ideas. You have to frame the information so students know where it fits into the broader arc of the semester/topic. You have to provide signposts in the lecture itself so students don’t get lost in the mass of information. Ideally you’re going to find ways to break up the lecture and get the students engaged.

Once you’re at this point, you’re starting to see all the skills in play. Being able to organize information into logical progressions is a skill. Being able to scaffold information is a skill. Being able to research is a skill. Hell, knowing how to learn is a skill.

For most academics who have trouble figuring out what their skills are, it’s because these skills are largely soft skills.

Soft skills are hard to hold on to

Soft skills are all of those capabilities that you can’t teach in a step-by-step way. Hard skills — knowing how to use a given software program, typing, math, knowing how to use a particular piece of equipment, etc. — are fairly obvious. Soft skills, on the other hand, are easy to dismiss because they can’t be easily broken down and because we falsely assume everyone is skilled that way.

Please, please believe me when I say that everyone does not have these skills. You’ve spent enough time teaching to know that while everyone can practice and improve, only a small group of people are really good at communicating, or problem-solving, or getting buy-in, or organizing people, or shepherding a project to completion. But these skills are foundational in the knowledge economy, and you’ve got them.

Here are some of the roles I’ve had and my friends have had in a medium-sized company over the past seven years:

  • Editor of a particular kind of content: making sure the content was clear, had the right tone, and didn’t say anything ridiculous.
  • Instructional designer and teacher: creating an internal training program and supervising the process and the trainees.
  • Communications liaison to external writers: identifying what they needed to know and translating from grumpy colleagues into “most likely to get results.”
  • Program designer and manager: figuring out how to use a particular resource and setting up the systems and processes to do it.
  • Payments and systems manager: keeping on top of details, building routines, and solving the problems that show up.
  • Internal communications expert: creating a repeatable communications plan that meets company goals and employee needs/desires.
  • Marketing coordinator: getting all the many moving parts into line so a marketing campaign can happen smoothly.
  • Managing editor: coordinating a stable of editors working on different kind of content and rethinking what content should happen and when.

Now, some of these may be entirely unappealing to you. But I doubt there’s a single one of these you couldn’t do.

Most of the jobs in the knowledge economy don’t flow from discrete degrees and linear careers. They’re messy, they’re connected to multiple other goals/teams/roles, and they’re based on a problem that needs to be solved right here and now.

And you can do them.

Filed Under: Practicalities Leave a Comment

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Meet Julie

Want to know what I'm all about? Click here to listen to me get interviewed by Daniel Mullen of The Unemployed Philosopher.

You can also learn more about my history -- Read More…

Myths and Mismatches eCourse

Jo VanEvery and I have put together a free eCourse on the most common myths and mismatches we see in people who are unhappy in academia.

It's one lens through which you can examine your own unhappiness and better diagnose the problem -- which makes finding a solution that much easier.

Find out more by clicking here!

Recent Posts

  • Writing Resumes and Cover Letters? Here Are Some Tips
  • I Still Think Calling Is Important
  • You Need Abundant, Luxurious Self-Care
  • Give Yourself Room to Fall Apart
  • Tip: Ask People About Their Jobs

Site Links

Affiliate Policy

Site Credits

Find Me Online

  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2009–2015 by Julie Clarenbach · All Rights Reserved