Escape the Ivory Tower

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Tell Your Story
  • About Julie

June 9, 2011

Whose dream is it?

I’m reading random back issues of the New Yorker, and I happened to come across a profile of Gil Scott-Heron, who passed away last week. One of the things he said stuck in my mind.

“All the dreams you show up in are not your own.”

He’s commenting on the ways that we sometimes show up as bit players in other people’s dreams, but it got me thinking.

Even as we show up in other people’s dreams, it’s important that the dreams we’re living out are our own.

Other people’s dreams

Sometimes our dreams for ourselves get taken over by other people. I see this sometimes in the people I talk to who are struggling with academia.

Maybe academia started out as your own dream, but somewhere along the way it got taken over by someone else’s dream – your advisor, whose dream for you is an R1, when your dream for yourself was a regional teaching university; your institution, whose dream for you is the tenure-track when yours was just graduate school.

Living out someone else’s dream can lead to focusing on something you don’t much care about, delaying family decisions you desperately want because someone won’t approve, making choices based on someone else’s values instead of your own.

Whose dream are you living right now?

Live your own life

What is your dream for yourself? When you imagine your perfect life, what does it look like?

When you imagine that perfect life, do you experience yourself yearning for it? If not, figure out whose dream it is, then imagine your perfect life again. What does it look like now?

We’ll never be satisfied by living someone else’s dreams. That’s not to say we never compromise or work in partnership with others, especially our partners, because of course we do. But that’s about a larger dream we’re all in, not giving over ours for someone else’s.

All the dreams you show up in are not your own. But make sure the ones you’re aiming for are yours.

Not sure what your dreams are? Join me and Jo VanEvery in a six-week class designed to help you figure out what your possibilities are. Click here to find out more.

Filed Under: What's My Calling? Leave a Comment

June 8, 2011

Diane Sawyer asks three questions

The other day at the library, I picked up a book called The Right Words at the Right Time. It’s small essay after small essay by famous people about the words that changed their lives. I found most of them unmoving (sometimes you have to be the person in question for the words to land right), but then I came across Diane Sawyer’s piece.

She’s describing a time when she was young and aimless, and her father asked her three questions: “What is it you love? Where is the most adventurous place you could do it? And are you certain it will serve other people?”

They’re a pretty good framework for thinking about your calling.

What is it you love?

We’ve talked about this one a lot, but it really is central. Doing what you love gives you energy, it doesn’t take it. Doing what you love gives you the impetus to work and grow and learn, because it isn’t a chore.

The biggest misconception I see with “do what you love” is the tendency to associate “what you love” with a job instead of with activities. We love talking to people. We love solving problems. We love organizing things. We love helping people who have been through shit come out the other side. We love teaching. We may love a job that incorporates all the right elements, but while the job may not be transferrable, the elements always are.

Where is the most adventurous place you could do it?

We have a tendency to think small. It’s easier to think about careers in the usual way.

But what if you could join the activities and skills that light you up with a context that blows you away? What feels adventurous to you?

For some people, adventure is about travel. They’ll teach English in a foreign country, sign on to an NGO, or hightail it to Thailand because you can live there for cheap while telecommuting to a company that pays a standard US salary.

But for some people, adventure is going to be rethinking their family arrangement to have each adult work half-time so both people get to spend lots of time with the toddler. For some people, adventure is going to be picking up and moving to the place you always wanted to live, because now you can.

One of the advantages of the mostly-crappy experience of coming to a crossroads is that everything is up for grabs. If you’re going to move anyway, why not move exactly where you’d like to? If you’re going to change careers anyway, why not explore the thing you’ve always secretly wanted to?

Are you certain it will serve other people?

It’s easy to reduce “serve other people” to Doctors Without Borders or the Peace Corps or teaching. But it’s so much more than that.

The person who writes young adult novels that help teens get a grip on their lives? Serving other people.

The person who designs beautiful furniture that doesn’t cost a first-born? Serving other people.

The person who designs surreal puppet shows that expand people’s minds? Serving other people.

The real question is, how is this serving other people? It’s about articulating to yourself how this betters the world, because connection work you love with the world gives it just a little more gravity.

Three questions

So how would you answer these three questions?

Filed Under: What's My Calling? Leave a Comment

June 7, 2011

Is leaving irrevocable?

Is leaving really irrevocable?

This is one of the biggest fears – and biggest stumbling blocks – I hear from people who are considering leaving. Once they make the decision to go, they say, there’s no going back.

And to a large extent, they’re right. Especially in a market like this one, where there are dozens, sometimes hundreds, of applicants for any given open position, hiring committees aren’t likely to look closely at someone who has left and returned when they’ve got application after application from bright young things just out of graduate school, bearing the latest theory and impressive credentials.

But that doesn’t mean the situation is quite as clear-cut as all that.

There are exceptions to every rule

This you-can’t-go-home-again bias is more true in the humanities than in the social sciences, business, or the hard sciences. Not only are the humanities the hardest hit in the undersupply of jobs and oversupply of PhDs, but the humanities encompass the fields that put the least value on practical, hands-on experience.

Many other fields have a long tradition of people moving from industry to higher ed and back. How likely it is in the case of any given academic depends on things as varied as specialty, grant funding, trends in the industry, and the phase of the moon.

The converse is not necessarily true

But often, when I’m talking with people who are afraid that if they walk away, a door closes forever, I’m wondering just how open that door actually is right now.

Given the trends in academia – towards contingent labor, towards less and less public funding, towards increased service obligations, towards fewer viable university presses and journals, towards an ever-more imbalance between the number of PhDs and the number of jobs available – I’m not sure that the door is open for any but a very few, very lucky people who happened to be in the right place at the right time with just exactly the right combination of scholarship and experience and personality.

In other words, the writing may be on the wall even if you aren’t deciding to walk away.

The realities of the job market are not about you

None of this is to say that you aren’t qualified or aren’t deserving or aren’t absolutely brilliant. You are. You are all of those things. You absolutely deserve a real job doing what you love.

Unfortunately, deserve has very little to do with what actually happens. And what is actually happening right now is that many – and I would say most — of the qualified, deserving, brilliant graduates aren’t getting those tenure-track jobs, because they don’t exist. And that’s not because anyone is out to get you, and it’s not because administrators don’t value tenure-track faculty. It’s because we happen to be around during a particular historical moment when the economic circumstances of higher ed are changing in ways that may never reverse.

So when people worry that walking away is irrevocable, what I always want to ask is how likely it is that staying will produce a different outcome. In every case I can think of, it’s not that the door was absolutely closed, but it wasn’t open very far. That’s because when people are honestly considering leaving, it’s because things, for one reason or another, haven’t worked out as planned or hoped.

Some people are going to want to take their chances on that crack, and that’s reasonable. But there will be a point at which that crack disappears and the door is effectively closed. Maybe it’s because you’re too many years out of school and you’re competing with people who are newly graduated. Maybe it’s because your field is being systematically trimmed from various institutions. Maybe it’s because tenure-lines in your field are rapidly disappearing and the only things that are really available are contingent positions.

When that door closes, the question of whether leaving is irrevocable isn’t really relevant anymore.

I hate being the voice of doom

But I hate watching people throw themselves against impossibilities even more. I hate watching bright, amazing people, people who have so much to offer, doubt their own self-worth because the numbers just weren’t in their favor. I hate watching people compromise their own futures by accepting section work that doesn’t pay the bills. I hate watching people get bitter and angry because things haven’t worked out.

This is a particularly horrible time in academia. Maybe it will shift for the better sometime. I really hope it does, because I believe in the importance of higher education and I believe particularly in the value of the humanities. I know too many amazing academics, people who are working hard with increasingly fewer resources, to write it all off.

But I also know too many amazing people who didn’t get the brass ring to believe that this situation is benign. It isn’t.

Walking away may be irrevocable. And if that door is still open a crack and you want to take your chances, power to you. I want every person who wants an academic job to get a good one, because we need that brilliance and dedication. We need it desperately.

But if that door is closed, I hope that you are able to mourn and walk away. Because the rest of the world needs your brilliance and dedication just as desperately.

If you’re walking away but don’t know what else you could do, join Jo VanEvery and me in a six-week class designed to help you figure out what your options are. We start June 12. Click here to find out more.

Filed Under: Grief and Leaving 1 Comment

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Meet Julie

Want to know what I'm all about? Click here to listen to me get interviewed by Daniel Mullen of The Unemployed Philosopher.

You can also learn more about my history -- Read More…

Myths and Mismatches eCourse

Jo VanEvery and I have put together a free eCourse on the most common myths and mismatches we see in people who are unhappy in academia.

It's one lens through which you can examine your own unhappiness and better diagnose the problem -- which makes finding a solution that much easier.

Find out more by clicking here!

Recent Posts

  • Writing Resumes and Cover Letters? Here Are Some Tips
  • I Still Think Calling Is Important
  • You Need Abundant, Luxurious Self-Care
  • Give Yourself Room to Fall Apart
  • Tip: Ask People About Their Jobs

Site Links

Affiliate Policy

Site Credits

Find Me Online

  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2009–2015 by Julie Clarenbach · All Rights Reserved