Escape the Ivory Tower

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Tell Your Story
  • About Julie

January 28, 2011

Getting over imposter syndrome

Turning a life lived in academia into something else can feel overwhelming. But there are strategies that work, and more resources than you can begin to imagine. Want to see all of the ones I’ve talked about so far? Click here for the job-search archives.

Applying for jobs can be uncomfortable

A while ago, I wrote a resume and cover letter for a client that left her deeply, deeply uncomfortable.

It wasn’t inaccurate. It wasn’t even stretching the truth – she had done every single thing on that resume just as it was described.

But she had spent so long believing that she didn’t have any relevant experience, that she didn’t have any transferrable skills, that she couldn’t reconcile her sense of herself with this description of her on paper.

Imposter syndrome rears its ugly head

Academics talk a lot about imposter syndrome, that sense of being a fraud and being afraid that any second now, someone is going to figure out that we aren’t as smart as they thought we were.

It’s often bandied about as a joke, as a form of “we’re all in this together” bonding, but for many people, it can be crippling. And it is nowhere as crippling as it is when you’re trying to get another job.

That’s because, in order to get a job, we have to talk about what we have to offer – which means we have to believe we have something to offer. When we don’t, things go downhill fast.

You’ve got a lot to offer

Academia doesn’t generally talk about the skills involved in doing all the work of higher education. It likes to focus on content knowledge, because that’s how it’s set up. Sure, different disciplines may have different kinds of research skills, and different disciplines may have different kinds of problems that require solving, but for the most part, we talk about disciplines in terms of what they study – not how they go about it.

We also rarely teach the underlying skills directly, with exceptions such as statistics and software packages. We expect people to learn them through osmosis, trial and error, or some other undisclosed method that comes down to “leave me alone” and “prove it.”

But just because we don’t talk about them and don’t teach them overtly doesn’t mean you haven’t learned and honed many, many skills during your time in academia.

It also doesn’t mean that the skills you’ve learned and honed in your life outside of academia are useless – despite academia’s pointed ignoring of anything else we do in our lives.

In fact, it’s nearly impossible to get through academia and to your late twenties (or later!) without picking up a whole host of skills that organizations outside academia would love to have: problem-solving, research, clear communication, the ability to manage and motivate groups of people, designing curricula, public speaking, coordinating events, managing budgets, supervising staff, and much, much more.

The first thing you have to do is convince yourself

But in order to convince someone else of your skills, you first have to convince yourself. And the best way to do this, I’ve found, is to work with someone objective – a friend, a family member, a coach – to put together a resume that is both accurate and a little discomfiting. Someone else will be able to ask you the questions that will help get all of your accomplishments down on paper even if, in your mind, they aren’t really worth anything.

When you see your skills right there in black and white, then you can attend to all those little voices that start speaking up in the back of your head – the ones that say things like, “But why do you think that’s good enough?” or “You call that managing a budget? It was only a conference!”

When that chorus starts up, then you have the opportunity to notice the fears and doubts that are standing between you and a confident application, and when you notice them, you can answer them.

Sometimes you can answer them by providing evidence: “Well, this is actually exactly what they’re asking for!”

Sometimes you can answer them by asking questions: “What does ‘good enough’ mean? What does it look like?”

However you answer them, getting them out in the open is nearly always the first step towards creating a strong application that accurately reflects your accomplishments – and thus helps you get a job.

Exploring our hard and soft skills is one of the things Jo VanEvery and I are teaching in our upcoming 8-week class, Choosing Your Career Consciously. If you’d like to learn more, click here.

Turning a life lived in academia into something else can feel overwhelming. But there are strategies that work, and more resources than you can begin to imagine. Want to see all of the ones I’ve talked about so far? Click here for the job-search archives.

Applying for jobs can be uncomfortable

A while ago, I wrote a resume and cover letter for a client that left her deeply, deeply uncomfortable.

It wasn’t inaccurate. It wasn’t even stretching the truth – she had done every single thing on that resume just as it was described.

But she had spent so long believing that she didn’t have any relevant experience, that she didn’t have any transferrable skills, that she couldn’t reconcile her sense of herself with this description of her on paper.

Imposter syndrome rears its ugly head

Academics talk a lot about imposter syndrome, that sense of being a fraud and being afraid that any second now, someone is going to figure out that we aren’t as smart as they thought we were.

It’s often bandied about as a joke, as a form of “we’re all in this together” bonding, but for many people, it can be crippling. And it is nowhere as crippling as it is when you’re trying to get another job.

That’s because, in order to get a job, we have to talk about what we have to offer – which means we have to believe we have something to offer. When we don’t, things go downhill fast.

You’ve got a lot to offer

Academia doesn’t generally talk about the skills involved in doing all the work of higher education. It likes to focus on content knowledge, because that’s how it’s set up. Sure, different disciplines may have different kinds of research skills, and different disciplines may have different kinds of problems that require solving, but for the most part, we talk about disciplines in terms of what they study – not how they go about it.

We also rarely teach the underlying skills directly, with exceptions such as statistics and software packages. We expect people to learn them through osmosis, trial and error, or some other undisclosed method that comes down to “leave me alone” and “prove it.”

But just because we don’t talk about them and don’t teach them overtly doesn’t mean you haven’t learned and honed many, many skills during your time in academia.

It also doesn’t mean that the skills you’ve learned and honed in your life outside of academia are useless – despite academia’s pointed ignoring of anything else we do in our lives.

In fact, it’s nearly impossible to get through academia and to your late twenties (or later!) without picking up a whole host of skills that organizations outside academia would love to have: problem-solving, research, clear communication, the ability to manage and motivate groups of people, designing curricula, public speaking, coordinating events, managing budgets, supervising staff, and much, much more.

The first thing you have to do is convince yourself

But in order to convince someone else of your skills, you first have to convince yourself. And the best way to do this, I’ve found, is to work with someone objective – a friend, a family member, a coach – to put together a resume that is both accurate and a little discomfiting. Someone else will be able to ask you the questions that will help get all of your accomplishments down on paper even if, in your mind, they aren’t really worth anything.

When you see your skills right there in black and white, then you can attend to all those little voices that start speaking up in the back of your head – the ones that say things like, “But why do you think that’s good enough?” or “You call that managing a budget? It was only a conference!”

When that chorus starts up, then you have the opportunity to notice the fears and doubts that are standing betw

Turning a life lived in academia into something else can feel overwhelming. But there are strategies that work, and more resources than you can begin to imagine. Want to see all of the ones I’ve talked about so far? Click here for the job-search archives.

Applying for jobs can be uncomfortable

A while ago, I wrote a resume and cover letter for a client that left her deeply, deeply uncomfortable.

It wasn’t inaccurate. It wasn’t even stretching the truth – she had done every single thing on that resume just as it was described.

But she had spent so long believing that she didn’t have any relevant experience, that she didn’t have any transferrable skills, that she couldn’t reconcile her sense of herself with this description of her on paper.

Imposter syndrome rears its ugly head

Academics talk a lot about imposter syndrome, that sense of being a fraud and being afraid that any second now, someone is going to figure out that we aren’t as smart as they thought we were.

It’s often bandied about as a joke, as a form of “we’re all in this together” bonding, but for many people, it can be crippling. And it is nowhere as crippling as it is when you’re trying to get another job.

That’s because, in order to get a job, we have to talk about what we have to offer – which means we have to believe we have something to offer. When we don’t, things go downhill fast.

You’ve got a lot to offer

Academia doesn’t generally talk about the skills involved in doing all the work of higher education. It likes to focus on content knowledge, because that’s how it’s set up. Sure, different disciplines may have different kinds of research skills, and different disciplines may have different kinds of problems that require solving, but for the most part, we talk about disciplines in terms of what they study – not how they go about it.

We also rarely teach the underlying skills directly, with exceptions such as statistics and software packages. We expect people to learn them through osmosis, trial and error, or some other undisclosed method that comes down to “leave me alone” and “prove it.”

But just because we don’t talk about them and don’t teach them overtly doesn’t mean you haven’t learned and honed many, many skills during your time in academia.

It also doesn’t mean that the skills you’ve learned and honed in your life outside of academia are useless – despite academia’s pointed ignoring of anything else we do in our lives.

In fact, it’s nearly impossible to get through academia and to your late twenties (or later!) without picking up a whole host of skills that organizations outside academia would love to have: problem-solving, research, clear communication, the ability to manage and motivate groups of people, designing curricula, public speaking, coordinating events, managing budgets, supervising staff, and much, much more.

The first thing you have to do is convince yourself

But in order to convince someone else of your skills, you first have to convince yourself. And the best way to do this, I’ve found, is to work with someone objective – a friend, a family member, a coach – to put together a resume that is both accurate and a little discomfiting. Someone else will be able to ask you the questions that will help get all of your accomplishments down on paper even if, in your mind, they aren’t really worth anything.

When you see your skills right there in black and white, then you can attend to all those little voices that start speaking up in the back of your head – the ones that say things like, “But why do you think that’s good enough?” or “You call that managing a budget? It was only a conference!”

When that chorus starts up, then you have the opportunity to notice the fears and doubts that are standing between you and a confident application, and when you notice them, you can answer them.

Sometimes you can answer them by providing evidence: “Well, this is actually exactly what they’re asking for!”

Sometimes you can answer them by asking questions: “What does ‘good enough’ mean? What does it look like?”

However you answer them, getting them out in the open is nearly always the first step towards creating a strong application that accurately reflects your accomplishments – and thus helps you get a job.

Exploring our hard and soft skills is one of the things Jo VanEvery and I are teaching in our upcoming 8-week class, Choosing Your Career Consciously. If you’d like to learn more, click here.

een you and a confident application, and when you notice them, you can answer them.

Sometimes you can answer them by providing evidence: “Well, this is actually exactly what they’re asking for!”

Sometimes you can answer them by asking questions: “What does ‘good enough’ mean? What does it look like?”

However you answer them, getting them out in the open is nearly always the first step towards creating a strong application that accurately reflects your accomplishments – and thus helps you get a job.

Exploring our hard and soft skills is one of the things Jo VanEvery and I are teaching in our upcoming 8-week class, Choosing Your Career Consciously. If you’d like to learn more, click here.

Filed Under: Turning Your Calling Into a Job Leave a Comment

January 26, 2011

In praise of the non-linear life

Finding a job is one thing — and an important thing, to be sure. But unless we spend the time and energy to figure out what we really want to be doing, we’re going to land right back where we are now: frustrated, restless, lost, and unhappy. This is where we talk about how we can uncover the things we most want to do with our lives. It’s also where I test out tools so you don’t have to. Click here for past posts.

The myth of the straight line

We have this idea that successful lives are linear, that if you were really meant to be a pianist or an engineer or a kindergarten teacher that the seeds of that life would have been manifest in our earliest days.

This is only reinforced by the way we talk and think about celebrities or “great people” – Tiger Woods, Mozart, Jodie Foster, Mahatma Ghandi. Whatever the reality, we want their lives to be written like novels, full of foreshadowing and fulfillment. It meets some deep need in us for resolution.

But as Mark Twain famously said, “Of course truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense.”

We aren’t likely to become celebrities

There are lots of reasons why our lives aren’t going to look like the public version of theirs.

First off, the narrative of their lives published in glossy magazines and thick biographies is likely to be much, much, much different than their lived experience of their lives. We can’t compare our insides to their outsides any more than we can compare their insides to their outsides. They’re always different.

Second, the people who get profiled and written about are nearly always the best of the best of the best. They’ve risen to the top of a very narrow field, and to do that requires the proverbial 10,000 hours of deep practice. Crazy focus is the wages of reaching those heights.

But I’m going to guess that you don’t actually want to be Tiger Woods or Jodie Foster.

Let’s define success

Our culture likes to define success in terms of three things: fame, money, and prestige. Ideally you want all three, but any one will do.

While I’m sure none of us would turn down the kind of money thrown around in “successful” circles, I’d also challenge us to think more deeply about what it means to be successful.

When researchers study happiness, what they find is that it’s not money that makes people happy, nor success as conventionally defined. Rather, it’s time spent in work that is challenging, absorbing, and meaningful to the individual.

Back to this idea of linearity

All of that means that, as we grow as people and as we have ongoing experiences both professional and personal, what is going to be challenging, absorbing, and meaningful to us is likely to shift over time. If it didn’t, challenging would soon become monumentally frustrating. Absorbing would become obsessing. Meaningful would become proving a point.

For those of us who aren’t going to be the very best ball player or flautist or dancer or corporate raider or whatever in the whole entire world, we don’t need 10,000 hours in one thing. We need constant growth and curiosity and exploration.

Our lives don’t have to be linear, because we’re writing a different narrative.

That doesn’t meant that, as we find and explore the work that is challenging, absorbing, and meaningful to us that there won’t be threads that connect the different eras of our lives – because there will be. We will always be ourselves doing all of these things.

But it does mean that we don’t have to identify or understand the thread in the present. Our only job is to continually seek out work that is challenging, absorbing, and meaningful to us.

The wide, wide world

One of the challenges of a non-linear life is being able to identify what comes next.

When things are linear, there’s a clear next step. When our lives are non-linear, we often have to seek out the next step. That can be frightening both the possibilities are both infinite and unknown. There are far more jobs and careers out there than are dreamt of in our academic philosophy.

But there are ways to tame that fear, because there are ways to both explore the unknown and limit the infinite. Remember – in a non-linear life, your job is not finding the Thing You Will Do Forever. It’s only finding the Next Right Step.

And that is simply a matter of marrying your curiosity to some everyday explorations.

Jo VanEvery and I are teaching an 8-week class by conference call that helps you do just that. If you’re interested in learning more, click here.

But whatever you do, remember that what comes next doesn’t have to be determined by what came before it. It only needs to be something challenging, absorbing, and meaningful.

Filed Under: What's My Calling? Leave a Comment

January 24, 2011

Monday roundup

A weekly collection of interesting things I find around the Internet. Find something I didn’t? I’d love to hear about it the comments!

What people were talking about this week

Inside Higher Ed offers a look at switching from academia to teaching at a private high school.

Frank Donoghue argues that the academy isn’t in crisis – and suggesting it is is to conflate the humanities with the whole.

How do you move beyond an interview that doesn’t lead to an offer?

What is the responsibility of academics to bring their work to the wider world?

A scholar describes the experience of not earning tenure and restarting her career. Part 1.

Timothy Burke explores incentives for faculty.

Filed Under: Monday Roundup Leave a Comment

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Meet Julie

Want to know what I'm all about? Click here to listen to me get interviewed by Daniel Mullen of The Unemployed Philosopher.

You can also learn more about my history -- Read More…

Myths and Mismatches eCourse

Jo VanEvery and I have put together a free eCourse on the most common myths and mismatches we see in people who are unhappy in academia.

It's one lens through which you can examine your own unhappiness and better diagnose the problem -- which makes finding a solution that much easier.

Find out more by clicking here!

Recent Posts

  • Writing Resumes and Cover Letters? Here Are Some Tips
  • I Still Think Calling Is Important
  • You Need Abundant, Luxurious Self-Care
  • Give Yourself Room to Fall Apart
  • Tip: Ask People About Their Jobs

Site Links

Affiliate Policy

Site Credits

Find Me Online

  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2009–2015 by Julie Clarenbach · All Rights Reserved